Improve your candidate NPS

Data shows candidates love these 3 things

Before we get into this weeks issue I’m excited to announce our upcoming Talent Leaders Breakfast in collaboration with Pinpoint.

We’re bringing together a small group to discuss how to optimise processes for candidate experience. Find more information and register your interest here.

Keeping on theme, this week we’re sharing insights on how to improve your candidate NPS with Mike Bradshaw, Head of Talent at Pinpoint.

We put together a mini-course (Designing Candidate Centric Processes) from not only Mike’s experience, but data points from 1,000s of other recruitment processes.

In this edition we’re sharing three small steps Mike took that made a big improvement to candidate NPS scores. Let’s get into it!

What are the foundations of a positive candidate experience?

A quick bit of context. Mike advocates that crafting a great candidate experience (CX) is crucial for building a strong employer brand and ultimately attracting top talent.

The topic of CX can however feel a little broad. Mike has defined four foundational pillars, this set of core principles that set the direction for his teams candidate experience focus.

Transparency = Providing clear information about the job, the company & the process.

Responsiveness = Communicating promptly with all candidates and keeping them informed.

Fairness = Treating all candidates with equity and ensuring a bias-free evaluation process.

Ease = Ensuring the application can be easily navigated and is accessible to all candidates.

When improving a process, Mike has it clear which of these pillars he is optimising for. With that in mind here are 3 examples of CX improvements:

1. Writing what a job isn’t on the advert

Generally Mike writes a job advert with a ‘minimum requirements mentality’ finding that candidates generally prefer shorter job adverts.

As an alternative to long requirements, he found adding a section on what the job is and the job is not was better received by allowing candidates to more easily self-select.

2. Don’t assume the optimal feedback channel

Effectively sharing feedback with candidates, even when it involves delivering unwelcome news, is a crucial indicator of the strength of a candidate experience process.

Though time-consuming, Mike chose to deliver feedback via phone calls. Offering a personal approach and detailed insights surely improved CX right?

Actually when surveyed, candidates for certain roles showed a strong preference for feedback via email. This allowed them to absorb at own pace, no discomfort of live conversations as well as other benefits detailed below.

I personally loved how Mike is willing to question his own assumptions by collecting data-points on what candidates actually want.

3. Prepare the interview team

Mike aims to treat interviews with the same care and preparation the sales team would for a prospect demo or customer call.

Intention + organisation + care = positive & respectful candidate experience.

This means preparing the interview team (and making sure they prepare for each interview too). Below is a template Mike sends to each interviewer to enable them in this process:

Measuring doesn’t need to be complex

To round-off, I wanted to share how Mike generally collects candidate feedback, in short, he keeps it simple:

  1. A 1-10 scale to collect NPS

  2. An open box for written feedback

This approach keeps response rates high, creating a more representative data-set.

I hope these steps were useful! In the full course we cover end-to-end process design to optimise CX, more details on accessing that plus 40 other mini-courses below.

Interested in learning more?

✅ That’s it for this week, we hope this was helpful! Please reply to this email with any feedback, we’d love to hear it.

💜 If you’d like to watch this full training session or continue learning from other TA leaders, check out PURPL.

💬 If you’re a TA leader who would like to contribute or learn about Purpl for your team, book in a call with me here.